posted Jan 23, 2012 10:48 PM by Dawn Olsen
January 21, 2012
Stars and Stripes|by Leo Shane III
WASHINGTON -- More than 2,200 veterans had their personal
information accidentally posted on the genealogy website Ancestry.com
last year, a move that could potentially expose them to identify theft
crimes.
Officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs said all of the
veterans affected by the mistake will receive free credit monitoring
services to help mitigate any damage. The information posted online
included veterans’ names and Social Security numbers, but not any health
information.
The department said there is no evidence so far that any of the
personal information has been misused, but the agency is contacting all
of the individuals involved to ensure they are aware of the problem.
VA officials supplied the information to Ancestry.com in March 2011
as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the genealogy
site. The records were supposed to only contain information on deceased
veterans, but also included more than 2,200 living veterans due to a
department error.
Department officials found out about the error just last month.
“Ancestry.com has worked with us and immediately removed all the
information that we had supplied them,” Jerry Davis, department chief
information security officer, said in a statement. “VA places the
highest priority upon safeguarding the personal information of our
veterans. When lapses occur, we will immediately take prompt remedial
action, such as notification.”
Officials said they are still investigating why the information was mistakenly included in the records released to Ancestry.com.
Military.com reported last year that servicemembers killed in action
are easy, frequent targets for identity theft because the Social
Security Administration is required by FOIA to release their personal
information, including full names and social security numbers, to an
online database used by sites such as Ancestry.com. That information can
then be used to file fraudulent tax returns.
Read more about that Military.com story here.
Individuals who believe they may have been affected by this incident
have been encouraged to contact the VA. Those whose information was
exposed will be eligible for a free credit report for one year.
Those veterans can access the free services by calling 1-877-322-8228 or by visiting http://www.annualcreditreport.com.
Military.com contributed to this report.
©
This article is provided courtesy of Stars and Stripes,
which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil
War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945
in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with
American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold
War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment
in the Middle East.
Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars and Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.
Stars and Stripes Website
© 2011
|
posted Aug 21, 2011 3:18 PM by Info @NesloVentures
August 11, 2011
The Commercial Appeal|by Lawrence Buser
Two former government employees have pleaded guilty in
federal court in Memphis to conspiring to embezzle nearly $900,000 from
veterans beneficiary accounts under their supervision.
Jack Perry,
75, and Robert Tabbutt, 67, admitted diverting funds from 10 different
accounts and using the money to pay personal expenses and to gamble at
Tunica casinos.
Perry had fiduciary duties over the accounts and Tabbutt is a former field examiner for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
If
a veteran cannot handle his or her affairs, the VA usually will appoint
a family member or, if necessary, ask the court to appoint one.
Federal prosecutor Justin Bailey said that between July 1999
and October 2008, the two men schemed to steal money from the
beneficiary accounts of disabled veterans by writing checks to
themselves from the accounts or withdrawing cash from the accounts.
They
pleaded guilty to embezzling $896,239.43 on Tuesday before U.S. Dist.
Court Judge S. Thomas Anderson. They will be sentenced Nov. 17.
"This
prosecution has brought to justice these two men, who were illegally
and shamefully taking benefits paid to disabled veterans for their own
selfish gain," U.S. Atty. Ed Stanton of Memphis said in a news release.
"We
will continue to work with the Department of Veterans' Affairs and
other law enforcement partners to prosecute those who would abuse their
positions of trust in order to prey on vulnerable members of our
community, especially veterans."
|
posted Jun 21, 2011 2:33 PM by Info @NesloVentures
May 21, 2011 • Ben Krause
In a recent audit
of the VA Disability Compensation System at 16 Regional Offices,
the VA Office of the Inspector General estimates that the rating
staff incorrectly processed 23 percent of the 45,000 claims inspected.
The
IG investigated offices throughout the US and focused mainly on the
handling of the following five types of claims: 1) extra-schedular 100 percent disability evaluations (TDIU), 2) PTSD, 3) TBI, 4) Herbicide Exposure, and 5) Haas (Haas v Nicholson:
“blue water” claims from Vietnam Agent Orange exposure). The
processes evaluated ranged from mail handling to actual disability
percentage awards.
Of the 16 Regional Offices, Baltimore, MD
and Anchorage, AK scored the lowest in compliance with VA
standards. Both failed to meet 14 of the 15 process requirements.
Extended management vacancies were cited as one of the linking
factors between all poorly performing Regional Offices. Because of
the vacancies, these offices lacked continuity and proper
oversight. As a result, procedures were not developed or
implemented to correct previously identified problems.
The Haas vs. Nicholson claims
had the highest rate of error. In January, the VA released a report
claiming the TDIU errors would have resulted in an overpayment of
over $1.1 billion by 2016. While this may be true, the VA made no
effort to project the amount of dollars not paid to incorrectly denied
veterans who would otherwise have qualified. It’s quite
possible that this amount might be much higher in the other
direction.
Meanwhile, at 83 percent of the Regional Offices,
Haas claims had a higher instance of the VA failing to follow VA
policy (5 of 6 surveyed failed the standard). Haas claims involve
veterans who were likely exposed to Agent Orange but never set foot in
Vietnam. Prior to the 2006 Haas v Nicholson decision,
mainly veterans who set foot on Vietnamese soil or road on craft up
rivers in Vietnam were entitled to the presumption of exposure.
Now, the VA is still attempting to catch up to the claims backlog that
was caused by the VA appeal of that 2006 decision. In 2009, the
decision for Haas was upheld and the VA has since struggled to
maintain continuity between offices in how the backlogged claims
are processed. The report stated some of these claims were incorrectly
denied after the initial Haas decision was upheld.
Veterans
receiving denials or low-ball ratings within the past year for any
disability ratings may want to consider immediately looking over
their decision and request a copy of their VA claim file. If the time passed since the decision is close to the 12-month appeal deadline, contact your Veteran Service Officer
to discuss the possibility of appealing it, if warranted. There
are both “for pay” and Pro Bono VSO’s. I suggest talking to the Pro
Bono people first. Try to find one you trust who will handle your
claim in a professional manner.
Veterans already denied at
the Board of Appeals review may want to consider speaking with a
Veterans Law Attorney in their area, since VSO’s cannot represent
veterans before the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Two
resources worth looking at are the National Organization of
Veterans Advocates (NOVA) and National Veterans Legal Services Program (NVLS).
There are many other attorneys out there as well. A simple Google
search could render quality results as well. Just be sure the lawyer
is accredited
by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Of course, confident
veterans can always opt to represent themselves Pro Se before the
court, as well.
Read more: VA Audit - 23% incorrectly denied claims www.MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com
|
posted May 31, 2011 12:46 PM by Info @NesloVentures
posted May 24, 2011 6:50 AM by Info @NesloVentures
By Rick Maze - Staff writer Posted : Monday May 23, 2011 16:30:07 EDT
VA health care workers and benefits processors are receiving new
training in how to handle disability evaluations for veterans claiming
traumatic brain injuries after an internal investigation found a high
percentage of errors on those types of claims.
A May 18 report by
the VA Inspector General says a spot review of disability claims found
an 8 percent error rate in claims related to post-traumatic stress
disorder and a 19 percent error rate in claims related to traumatic
brain injury.
Half of the PTSD claims and slightly more than half of the TBI claims affected benefits, according to the report.
Overall,
the IG found a 23 percent error rate in the cases it reviewed, stemming
mainly from the fact that 82 percent of claims involved temporary 100
percent disability ratings for veterans who needed surgery or a specific
treatment for their service-connected disability. The majority of these
errors were technical and did not affect benefits, the report said.
For
PTSD-related claims, a review of 16,000 files processed between April
2009 and July 2010 found that the VA employees processing claims lacked
enough experience and training to be accurate.
The single biggest
mistake was failing to verify a specific event or events in service that
resulted in the stress, something that became easier in July 2010 when
VA rules were amended so a veteran’s statement by itself is considered
sufficient evidence. However, one-quarter of the errors resulted from
assigning incorrect effective dates to claims, and about 20 percent of
the errors involved incorrect mental health evaluations.
VA officials said they believe the problems with PTSD cases are resolved but will continue to monitor accuracy.
For
TBI, investigators looked at 4,100 claims completed from April 2009
through July 2010 and found 800 were processed incorrectly. Like the
problems with PTSD claims, the chief problem was inexperience and
undertrained staff, the report said.
Eighty-four percent of the
errors were the result of problems with medical examinations being
either inadequate or incorrect in identifying the symptoms of TBI and
whether there were residual disabilities that coexisted with other
mental conditions.
In response to the report, VA benefits and
health care officials said they are working to ensure that compensation
and pension examiners are trained in the proper procedures and will
require regional offices that process benefits to provide a second
reviewer for many TBI-related claims. A rater will be allowed to work
without a reviewer only if they have achieved a 90 percent accuracy rate
on 10 consecutive TBI cases, VA officials said in their formal response
to the report.
Training for medical personal in proper exam
procedures should be completed by June 30, but the new process for
second reviews of TBI cases will not take effect until Sept. 30. |
posted May 24, 2011 6:27 AM by Info @NesloVentures
According to a recent Military Times article, a May 18
report by the VA Inspector General says a spot review of disability
claims found an 8 percent error rate in claims related to post-traumatic
stress disorder and a 19 percent error rate in claims related to
traumatic brain injury. Half of the PTSD claims and slightly more than
half of the TBI claims affected benefits, according to the report.
Overall, the IG found a 23 percent error rate in the cases it reviewed,
stemming mainly from the fact that 82 percent of claims involved
temporary 100 percent disability ratings for veterans who needed surgery
or a specific treatment for their service-connected disability. The
majority of these errors were technical and did not affect benefits, the
report said.
A review of 16,000 PTSD claims files processed between April 2009 and
July 2010 revealed that the single biggest mistake was failing to
verify a specific event or events in service that resulted in the
stress, something that became easier in July 2010 when VA rules were
amended so a veteran’s statement by itself is considered sufficient
evidence. However, one-quarter of the errors resulted from assigning
incorrect effective dates to claims, and about 20 percent of the errors
involved incorrect mental health evaluations. For TBI, investigators
looked at 4,100 claims completed from April 2009 through July 2010 and
found 800 were processed incorrectly. Eighty-four percent of the errors
were the result of problems with medical examinations being either
inadequate or incorrect in identifying the symptoms of TBI and whether
there were residual disabilities that coexisted with other mental
conditions. The errors were found to be largely the result of lack of
sufficient experience and training. In response to the report, VA
benefits and health care officials said they are working to ensure that
compensation and pension examiners are trained in the proper procedures
and will require regional offices that process benefits to provide a
second reviewer for many TBI-related claims.
For more information, please see: www.militarytimes.com/news/2011/05/military-VA-PTSD-brain-injury-claims-errors-052311w/.
|
posted May 5, 2011 8:33 AM by Info @NesloVentures
[
updated May 5, 2011 8:44 AM
]
10:58 PM, May 4, 2011 Courtesy of KSDK By Leisa Zigman, I-Team Reporter
St. Louis, MO (KSDK) - Some veterans in the St.
Louis region are still having surgery and dental procedures canceled or
postponed two months after the all clear was given at the St. Louis VA
Medical Center.
Officials suspended all procedures on February 2, 2011 after an
employee found a surgical tray pitted with corrosion. Multiple
investigations took place and more than 200 surgeries scheduled at the
facility were instead performed at other St. Louis hospitals at tax
payer's expense.
The center reopened March 10, more than a month after closure. VA
experts, along with private vendors and independent consultants,
examined the sterilization processing department and determined it was
safe to start surgeries again. But veterans are still having surgeries
and dental procedures postponed.
The hold up, according to VA officials, has to do with the decision
to replace or restore 63,000 dental and surgical instruments.
"We have a patient safety culture here. We wanted to make sure when
the instruments come out that we felt comfortable using them on
patients," said Dr. Michael Crittenden, Chief of Surgery.
He explained the enormity and complexity of the restoration process
takes time. But veterans tell the I-Team, all of that time is taking a
toll on services they've earned.
The surgery center is operating only at 70 percent while the dental
clinic hasn't done any restorative work like fillings or crowns in four
months. Routine dental cleanings are taking place at 60 percent of what
it was prior to the February closure.
One patient, who feared speaking on camera, said she had three
appointments canceled since February and worries about losing some of
her teeth.
"It just makes my blood boil that any veteran would be put in that
situation but also, these are lingering problems from what has happened
months and months and months ago," said Congressman Russ Carnahan, who
spearheaded a campaign for investigations and congressional hearings.
National Dental Labs contacted by the I-Team, say restoring dental
instruments should take three days. So why after eight weeks are
surgeries and dental procedures still being canceled?
Aesculap, a German company, is restoring the VA's instruments at its
Hazelwood facility. A company vice president told the I-Team, "We have
been working with St. Louis VA since mid-February...we don't control
what we receive and when...but it's typically a three day turn around."
VA officials insist it is not a procurement or bureaucratic red tape
problem. Dr. Crittenden said turnaround is taking longer than three days
but he is very pleased with the quality of work Aesculap has provided.
He said if a patient has a dental emergency, the VA will pay for an
outside dentist. Dr. Crittenden said they've paid for outside services
more than 100 times since the February closure.
Officials at the VA hope to be back to 100 percent capacity at both the
surgical and dental centers sometime in the next two weeks.
The sterilization concern was the second in less than a year at the
Cochran center. In 2010, faulty sterilization at the center's dental
clinic raised concerns that 1,812 veterans were potentially exposed to
hepatitis and HIV. Most of those veterans have been tested and no cases
of HIV or hepatitis have been connected to the dental clinic.
A Congressional hearing titled "Sacred Obligation: Restoring Veteran
Trust and Patient Safety," is now taking place in Washington, D.C.
KSDK |
posted May 4, 2011 3:34 PM by Info @NesloVentures

Courtesy www.disabledveterans.org
Thousands of disabled veterans apply for Chapter 31 Vocational
Rehabilitation every year. Some are successful in getting the benefits
they deserve and some are not. In my time researching and writing on the
subject, there seems to be a common theme arising: lies. This leads one
to conclude that either there are guidelines to excuses somewhere that
Voc Rehab Counselors live by, or there is an underlying discussion
between offices as to what excuses can be used to keep deserving
disabled veterans from their benefits.
It reminds me of a period of my life when I spent a great deal of my
recreational time researching the Bible. Living in England at the time, I
used the ESV Bible, the Cambridge Companion to the Bible, the Nag
Hammadi Scriptures, and a copy of The Living Buddha, Living Christ that
my grandmother sent me. Over the years, scholars have found there to be
such commonality between the
New Testament Gospels that they came to believe there existed a fifth
text referred to as “Q.” Q is believed by many scholars to be the first
written gospel that contained many of the quotes and anecdotes of Jesus’
time on Earth.
In a similar way, one cannot help but speculate that there is a
similar text that creates a common set of lies Voc Rehab Counselors tell
disabled veterans when denying claims. Yet in my searches for it, I
seem to only find regulations that support veterans’ claims for benefits
— strange.
Background. The Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (DVA OIG) ordered an audit of the VR&E program in 2007 and a subsequent survey sampling of 80,000 veterans to
find out why so many disabled veterans never complete the program.
While VR&E boasts a success rate of close to 75 percent to the U.S.
Congress, the real number is much lower. According to the DVA OIG, the
true success rate is closer to 18 percent. Most qualified veterans drop
out of Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) prior to
developing an Individual Written Rehabilitation Plan (IWRP). Many more
drop out prior to finishing the program. VR&E has not been including
these cases in their reported success rate.
In Corporate America, this is called “cooking the books,” for which
people have gone to jail and been sued. Lucky for VR&E, the
officials of this ENRON of the federal government are largely blanketed
by sovereign immunity. The government has to agree to let you sue the
government. Convenient.
The following is a list of a few of most common fish stories given by
Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors to deny veterans access to Chapter
31 benefits:
1. Veterans with high disability ratings usually fail to complete their training.
2. You cannot use Voc Rehab if you are Individually Unemployable (IU).
3. Veterans with families have a harder time completing their programs.
4. Voc Rehab will not pay for graduate school.
5. If you have a job, you do not qualify for Voc Rehab.
Lies – all lies. In a VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) Training Module Study Plan
you can get plenty of valuable information about the program. Combined
with the audit and survey linked above, the majority of truths to the
lies can be found. So let’s raise the curtain a bit to reveal the great
Oz.
Lie #1 – Veterans with high disability ratings usually fail to complete their training.
Truth – The survey states that veterans with a higher disability rating
also have a higher likelihood of successfully completing their program.
This includes veterans with VR&E ratings of “serious employment
handicap.”
Lie #2 – You cannot use Voc Rehab if you are Individually Unemployable (IU).
Truth – According to the training module, veterans with a 100 percent
disability rating can and do use VR&E for retraining purposes to
obtain jobs, if possible. Additionally, veterans with an IU are also
allowed to use the program. Further, finishing the training program does
not automatically result in a reduction of IU. Supposedly, it cannot be
reduced for a year following employment.
Lie #3 – Veterans with families have a harder time completing their programs.
Truth – There is no significant effect on program success rates when
comparing veterans with families to those without families. This
includes a comparison between veterans relating to spouses and veterans
with children.
Lie #4 – Voc Rehab will not pay for graduate school.
Truth – I used VR&E for my undergrad and now have an Individualized
Written Rehabilitation Plan stating I can attend law school in the
program. ‘Nuff said. VR&E will send people to graduate school, to
include law school, medical school, dental school, and airline pilot
training. It can also pay for starting small businesses and allocating
in excess of $100,000 for the start up, according to participating SBA
Veteran Business Counselors working with the program.
Lie #5 – If you have a job, you do not qualify for Voc Rehab.
Truth – Over 42 percent of all disabled veterans using VR&E services
are employed at the time of admittance. Thirty-five percent hold jobs
throughout the period of retraining. Of those, over half of them felt
their current job was inline with their military and/or civilian
training. So, 28,000 veterans who used VR&E for retraining were
employed at the time they entered the program.
That’s the truth about the VA, according to the VA. The information
is out there, but it’s not presented in way that is readily accessible.
Plus, it’s hard to pick your head up to do the research when your horns
are locked with your Voc Rehab Counselor.
To the quality counselors out there, thank you for your diligent
efforts to support disabled veterans in their quest for purpose and
success outside of the green uniform. And to those who dish out fish
stories, I for one have had it up to my eyeballs with you. There will be
a day of reckoning, in this life or the next. Accountability will come
for all the lives that have been hurt by the renegade behavior of some
Voc Rehab Counselors. Many media outlets have begun to investigate the
actions of the VA, including the actions of Voc Rehab officials. To you
who do harm to vets, it’s time to be on the right side of this story.
Email questions to: help@disabledveterans.org
|
posted May 4, 2011 3:31 PM by Info @NesloVentures
December 23, 2010 -
Vietnam Veterans suffering specific presumptive illnesses related to
their Agent Orange exposure while in service began filing their
disability claims approximately 6 weeks ago. In that time period, the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) processed and resolved over 28,000
claims.
VA Sec. Eric Shinseki credited the VA's ability to process so many
disability claims so quickly to improved technology. At the same time,
he cited the continuous improving and streamlining of the disability
claims process. According to Sec. Shinseki, the VA is also aggressively
reaching out to Vietnam veterans and pushing them to put in their
disability claims and take advantage of the earned benefits.
This new Agent Orange presumptive disease list allows Vietnam veterans diagnosed with the following illnesses to collect disability benefits as well as be eligible for health care:
- Parkinson's Disease;
- Ischemic heart disease; or
- B-cell (hairy cell) leukemia.
All Vietnam veterans suffering from an illness listed on the VA's
presumptive list can file for disability compensation. Because of the
number of claims the VA anticipated would be filed when they updated
their presumptive illness, these claims are the first to utilize the
VA's automated claims processing system.
Veterans can also be treated for their service-related presumptive
illnesses through non-VA physicians. These claims can also be filed as
long as they are accompanied with the correct paperwork.
|
posted May 4, 2011 6:29 AM by Info @NesloVentures
ST. PETERSBURG, Florida - From his one-room apartment, Terry Richards does what he can to survive below the poverty level.
Richards, 62, is a Vietnam-era vet makes less than $12,000 a year in
social security and pension benefits. In years he spends a large
portion of his income on medical expenses, he gets partial
reimbursement.
"Every penny counts for me and others like me," Richards said of the
637,000 veterans and family members who rely on Veterans Benefits
Administration (VBA) pensions.
See Also: Vets lose benefits as VA covers up mistake
But Richards recently discovered that the miles he claimed for trips
to his doctor's appointments weren't reimbursed at the 41.5-cent rate
Congress mandated in 2008. Because the VA hadn't updated its expense report form in years, veterans were still instructed to only claim 28.5 cents per mile.
For Richards, it made the difference of $56 one year. 10 News found other veterans with larger discrepancies.
"$56 is a lot of money when you only make $985 a month," Richards said.
He started writing letters to the VBA and Congressman Bill Young, a
long-time veterans advocate. The VBA eventually sent him a check for
the $56, but still didn't update the forms.
A spokesperson for the agency told 10 News that updating
the form online was unnecessary, since the VBA automatically credits
veterans the difference once they send in their annual reports with the
wrong amount.
But they didn't in the cases 10 News studied. They also weren't able to tell how many of the forms were turned in last year.
Congressman Young eventually penned a letter to the head of the agency,
citing "the need to immediate update the VA's 'Medical Expense Report'
form (VA Form 21-8416) to ensure that our nation's veterans are properly
being reimbursed for their travel expenses."
READ: Rep. Bill Young's letter (PDF)
Young also urged an audit of reports filed to find out how many
veterans may have been shortchanged since Congress changed the
reimbursement rate in 2008. |
|