Affiliations & Memberships



Hot News‎ > ‎

Veterans Administration News


VA Accidentally Releases Vets' Personal Info

posted Jan 23, 2012 10:48 PM by Dawn Olsen

January 21, 2012
Stars and Stripes|by Leo Shane III

WASHINGTON -- More than 2,200 veterans had their personal information accidentally posted on the genealogy website Ancestry.com last year, a move that could potentially expose them to identify theft crimes.

Officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs said all of the veterans affected by the mistake will receive free credit monitoring services to help mitigate any damage. The information posted online included veterans’ names and Social Security numbers, but not any health information.

The department said there is no evidence so far that any of the personal information has been misused, but the agency is contacting all of the individuals involved to ensure they are aware of the problem.

VA officials supplied the information to Ancestry.com in March 2011 as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by the genealogy site. The records were supposed to only contain information on deceased veterans, but also included more than 2,200 living veterans due to a department error.

Department officials found out about the error just last month.

“Ancestry.com has worked with us and immediately removed all the information that we had supplied them,” Jerry Davis, department chief information security officer, said in a statement. “VA places the highest priority upon safeguarding the personal information of our veterans. When lapses occur, we will immediately take prompt remedial action, such as notification.”

Officials said they are still investigating why the information was mistakenly included in the records released to Ancestry.com.

Military.com reported last year that servicemembers killed in action are easy, frequent targets for identity theft because the Social Security Administration is required by FOIA to release their personal information, including full names and social security numbers, to an online database used by sites such as Ancestry.com. That information can then be used to file fraudulent tax returns.

Read more about that Military.com story here.

Individuals who believe they may have been affected by this incident have been encouraged to contact the VA. Those whose information was exposed will be eligible for a free credit report for one year.

Those veterans can access the free services by calling 1-877-322-8228 or by visiting http://www.annualcreditreport.com.

Military.com contributed to this report.

©

 This article is provided courtesy of Stars and Stripes, which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the Middle East.

Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars and Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.

Stars and Stripes Website

© 2011

Two Plead Guilty to Embezzling from Disabled Vets

posted Aug 21, 2011 3:18 PM by Info @NesloVentures

August 11, 2011
The Commercial Appeal|by Lawrence Buser

Two former government employees have pleaded guilty in federal court in Memphis to conspiring to embezzle nearly $900,000 from veterans beneficiary accounts under their supervision.

Jack Perry, 75, and Robert Tabbutt, 67, admitted diverting funds from 10 different accounts and using the money to pay personal expenses and to gamble at Tunica casinos.

Perry had fiduciary duties over the accounts and Tabbutt is a former field examiner for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

If a veteran cannot handle his or her affairs, the VA usually will appoint a family member or, if necessary, ask the court to appoint one.

Federal prosecutor Justin Bailey said that between July 1999 and October 2008, the two men schemed to steal money from the beneficiary accounts of disabled veterans by writing checks to themselves from the accounts or withdrawing cash from the accounts.

They pleaded guilty to embezzling $896,239.43 on Tuesday before U.S. Dist. Court Judge S. Thomas Anderson. They will be sentenced Nov. 17.

"This prosecution has brought to justice these two men, who were illegally and shamefully taking benefits paid to disabled veterans for their own selfish gain," U.S. Atty. Ed Stanton of Memphis said in a news release.

"We will continue to work with the Department of Veterans' Affairs and other law enforcement partners to prosecute those who would abuse their positions of trust in order to prey on vulnerable members of our community, especially veterans."

23% of Disability Claims Processed Incorrectly

posted Jun 21, 2011 2:33 PM by Info @NesloVentures

May 21, 2011Ben Krause

In a recent audit of the VA Dis­abil­ity Com­pen­sa­tion Sys­tem at 16 Regional Offices, the VA Office of the Inspec­tor Gen­eral esti­mates that the rat­ing staff incor­rectly processed 23 per­cent of the 45,000 claims inspected.

The IG inves­ti­gated offices through­out the US and focused mainly on the han­dling of the fol­low­ing five types of claims: 1) extra-schedular 100 per­cent dis­abil­ity eval­u­a­tions (TDIU), 2) PTSD, 3) TBI, 4) Her­bi­cide Expo­sure, and 5) Haas (Haas v Nichol­son: “blue water” claims from Viet­nam Agent Orange expo­sure). The processes eval­u­ated ranged from mail han­dling to actual dis­abil­ity per­cent­age awards.

Of the 16 Regional Offices, Bal­ti­more, MD and Anchor­age, AK scored the low­est in com­pli­ance with VA stan­dards. Both failed to meet 14 of the 15 process require­ments. Extended man­age­ment vacan­cies were cited as one of the link­ing fac­tors between all poorly per­form­ing Regional Offices. Because of the vacan­cies, these offices lacked con­ti­nu­ity and proper over­sight. As a result, pro­ce­dures were not devel­oped or imple­mented to cor­rect pre­vi­ously iden­ti­fied prob­lems.

The Haas vs. Nichol­son claims had the high­est rate of error. In Jan­u­ary, the VA released a report claim­ing the TDIU errors would have resulted in an over­pay­ment of over $1.1 bil­lion by 2016. While this may be true, the VA made no effort to project the amount of dol­lars not paid to incor­rectly denied vet­er­ans who would oth­er­wise have qual­i­fied. It’s quite pos­si­ble that this amount might be much higher in the other direc­tion.

Mean­while, at 83 per­cent of the Regional Offices, Haas claims had a higher instance of the VA fail­ing to fol­low VA pol­icy (5 of 6 sur­veyed failed the stan­dard). Haas claims involve vet­er­ans who were likely exposed to Agent Orange but never set foot in Viet­nam. Prior to the 2006 Haas v Nichol­son deci­sion, mainly vet­er­ans who set foot on Viet­namese soil or road on craft up rivers in Viet­nam were enti­tled to the pre­sump­tion of expo­sure. Now, the VA is still attempt­ing to catch up to the claims back­log that was caused by the VA appeal of that 2006 deci­sion. In 2009, the deci­sion for Haas was upheld and the VA has since strug­gled to main­tain con­ti­nu­ity between offices in how the back­logged claims are processed. The report stated some of these claims were incor­rectly denied after the ini­tial Haas deci­sion was upheld.

Vet­er­ans receiv­ing denials or low-ball rat­ings within the past year for any dis­abil­ity rat­ings may want to con­sider imme­di­ately look­ing over their deci­sion and request a copy of their VA claim file. If the time passed since the deci­sion is close to the 12-month appeal dead­line, con­tact your Vet­eran Ser­vice Offi­cer to dis­cuss the pos­si­bil­ity of appeal­ing it, if war­ranted. There are both “for pay” and Pro Bono VSO’s. I sug­gest talk­ing to the Pro Bono peo­ple first. Try to find one you trust who will han­dle your claim in a pro­fes­sional man­ner.

Vet­er­ans already denied at the Board of Appeals review may want to con­sider speak­ing with a Vet­er­ans Law Attor­ney in their area, since VSO’s can­not rep­re­sent vet­er­ans before the US Court of Appeals for Vet­er­ans Claims. Two resources worth look­ing at are the National Orga­ni­za­tion of Vet­er­ans Advo­cates (NOVA) and National Vet­er­ans Legal Ser­vices Pro­gram (NVLS). There are many other attor­neys out there as well. A sim­ple Google search could ren­der qual­ity results as well. Just be sure the lawyer is accred­ited by the Depart­ment of Vet­er­ans Affairs. Of course, con­fi­dent vet­er­ans can always opt to rep­re­sent them­selves Pro Se before the court, as well.


Read more: VA Audit - 23% incorrectly denied claims
www.MilitaryAdvantage.Military.com

posted May 31, 2011 12:46 PM by Info @NesloVentures


Many errors in VA mental health claims

posted May 24, 2011 6:50 AM by Info @NesloVentures

By Rick Maze - Staff writer Posted : Monday May 23, 2011 16:30:07 EDT

VA health care workers and benefits processors are receiving new training in how to handle disability evaluations for veterans claiming traumatic brain injuries after an internal investigation found a high percentage of errors on those types of claims.

A May 18 report by the VA Inspector General says a spot review of disability claims found an 8 percent error rate in claims related to post-traumatic stress disorder and a 19 percent error rate in claims related to traumatic brain injury.

Half of the PTSD claims and slightly more than half of the TBI claims affected benefits, according to the report.

Overall, the IG found a 23 percent error rate in the cases it reviewed, stemming mainly from the fact that 82 percent of claims involved temporary 100 percent disability ratings for veterans who needed surgery or a specific treatment for their service-connected disability. The majority of these errors were technical and did not affect benefits, the report said.

For PTSD-related claims, a review of 16,000 files processed between April 2009 and July 2010 found that the VA employees processing claims lacked enough experience and training to be accurate.

The single biggest mistake was failing to verify a specific event or events in service that resulted in the stress, something that became easier in July 2010 when VA rules were amended so a veteran’s statement by itself is considered sufficient evidence. However, one-quarter of the errors resulted from assigning incorrect effective dates to claims, and about 20 percent of the errors involved incorrect mental health evaluations.

VA officials said they believe the problems with PTSD cases are resolved but will continue to monitor accuracy.

For TBI, investigators looked at 4,100 claims completed from April 2009 through July 2010 and found 800 were processed incorrectly. Like the problems with PTSD claims, the chief problem was inexperience and undertrained staff, the report said.

Eighty-four percent of the errors were the result of problems with medical examinations being either inadequate or incorrect in identifying the symptoms of TBI and whether there were residual disabilities that coexisted with other mental conditions.

In response to the report, VA benefits and health care officials said they are working to ensure that compensation and pension examiners are trained in the proper procedures and will require regional offices that process benefits to provide a second reviewer for many TBI-related claims. A rater will be allowed to work without a reviewer only if they have achieved a 90 percent accuracy rate on 10 consecutive TBI cases, VA officials said in their formal response to the report.

Training for medical personal in proper exam procedures should be completed by June 30, but the new process for second reviews of TBI cases will not take effect until Sept. 30.

Errors Found in Processing of PTSD and TBI Claims

posted May 24, 2011 6:27 AM by Info @NesloVentures

On May 24, 2011, in In the News, by VetLawyers

According to a recent Military Times article, a May 18 report by the VA Inspector General says a spot review of disability claims found an 8 percent error rate in claims related to post-traumatic stress disorder and a 19 percent error rate in claims related to traumatic brain injury. Half of the PTSD claims and slightly more than half of the TBI claims affected benefits, according to the report. Overall, the IG found a 23 percent error rate in the cases it reviewed, stemming mainly from the fact that 82 percent of claims involved temporary 100 percent disability ratings for veterans who needed surgery or a specific treatment for their service-connected disability. The majority of these errors were technical and did not affect benefits, the report said. 

A review of 16,000 PTSD claims files processed between April 2009 and July 2010 revealed that the single biggest mistake was failing to verify a specific event or events in service that resulted in the stress, something that became easier in July 2010 when VA rules were amended so a veteran’s statement by itself is considered sufficient evidence. However, one-quarter of the errors resulted from assigning incorrect effective dates to claims, and about 20 percent of the errors involved incorrect mental health evaluations.  For TBI, investigators looked at 4,100 claims completed from April 2009 through July 2010 and found 800 were processed incorrectly. Eighty-four percent of the errors were the result of problems with medical examinations being either inadequate or incorrect in identifying the symptoms of TBI and whether there were residual disabilities that coexisted with other mental conditions.  The errors were found to be largely the result of lack of sufficient experience and training.   In response to the report, VA benefits and health care officials said they are working to ensure that compensation and pension examiners are trained in the proper procedures and will require regional offices that process benefits to provide a second reviewer for many TBI-related claims.

For more information, please see:  www.militarytimes.com/news/2011/05/military-VA-PTSD-brain-injury-claims-errors-052311w/.

St. Louis VA surgeries and dental still being canceled

posted May 5, 2011 8:33 AM by Info @NesloVentures   [ updated May 5, 2011 8:44 AM ]

10:58 PM, May 4, 2011 Courtesy of KSDK By Leisa Zigman, I-Team Reporter

St. Louis, MO (KSDK) - Some veterans in the St. Louis region are still having surgery and dental procedures canceled or postponed two months after the all clear was given at the St. Louis VA Medical Center.

Officials suspended all procedures on February 2, 2011 after an employee found a surgical tray pitted with corrosion. Multiple investigations took place and more than 200 surgeries scheduled at the facility were instead performed at other St. Louis hospitals at tax payer's expense.

The center reopened March 10, more than a month after closure. VA experts, along with private vendors and independent consultants, examined the sterilization processing department and determined it was safe to start surgeries again.  But veterans are still having surgeries and dental procedures postponed.

The hold up, according to VA officials, has to do with the decision to replace or restore 63,000 dental and surgical instruments.

"We have a patient safety culture here. We wanted to make sure when the instruments come out that we felt comfortable using them on patients," said Dr. Michael Crittenden, Chief of Surgery.

He explained the enormity and complexity of the restoration process takes time.  But veterans tell the I-Team, all of that time is taking a toll on services they've earned.

The surgery center is operating only at 70 percent while the dental clinic hasn't done any restorative work like fillings or crowns in four months. Routine dental cleanings are taking place at 60 percent of what it was prior to the February closure.

One patient, who feared speaking on camera, said she had three appointments canceled since February and worries about losing some of her teeth.

"It just makes my blood boil that any veteran would be put in that situation but also, these are lingering problems from what has happened months and months and months ago," said Congressman Russ Carnahan, who spearheaded a campaign for investigations and congressional hearings. 

National Dental Labs contacted by the I-Team, say restoring dental instruments should take three days.  So why after eight weeks are surgeries and dental procedures still being canceled?

Aesculap, a German company, is restoring the VA's instruments at its Hazelwood facility.  A company vice president told the I-Team, "We have been working with St. Louis VA since mid-February...we don't control what we receive and when...but it's typically a three day turn around."

VA officials insist it is not a procurement or bureaucratic red tape problem. Dr. Crittenden said turnaround is taking longer than three days but he is very pleased with the quality of work Aesculap has provided.

He said if a patient has a dental emergency, the VA will pay for an outside dentist. Dr. Crittenden said they've paid for outside services more than 100 times since the February closure.
Officials at the VA hope to be back to 100 percent capacity at both the surgical and dental centers sometime in the next two weeks.

The sterilization concern was the second in less than a year at the Cochran center. In 2010, faulty sterilization at the center's dental clinic raised concerns that 1,812 veterans were potentially exposed to hepatitis and HIV. Most of those veterans have been tested and no cases of HIV or hepatitis have been connected to the dental clinic.

A Congressional hearing titled "Sacred Obligation: Restoring Veteran Trust and Patient Safety," is now taking place in Washington, D.C.

KSDK

Biggest Lies Voc Rehab Tells Disabled Veterans

posted May 4, 2011 3:34 PM by Info @NesloVentures

Courtesy www.disabledveterans.org

Thousands of disabled veterans apply for Chapter 31 Vocational Rehabilitation every year. Some are successful in getting the benefits they deserve and some are not. In my time researching and writing on the subject, there seems to be a common theme arising: lies. This leads one to conclude that either there are guidelines to excuses somewhere that Voc Rehab Counselors live by, or there is an underlying discussion between offices as to what excuses can be used to keep deserving disabled veterans from their benefits.

It reminds me of a period of my life when I spent a great deal of my recreational time researching the Bible. Living in England at the time, I used the ESV Bible, the Cambridge Companion to the Bible, the Nag Hammadi Scriptures, and a copy of The Living Buddha, Living Christ that my grandmother sent me. Over the years, scholars have found there to be such commonality between the New Testament Gospels that they came to believe there existed a fifth text referred to as “Q.” Q is believed by many scholars to be the first written gospel that contained many of the quotes and anecdotes of Jesus’ time on Earth.

In a similar way, one cannot help but speculate that there is a similar text that creates a common set of lies Voc Rehab Counselors tell disabled veterans when denying claims. Yet in my searches for it, I seem to only find regulations that support veterans’ claims for benefits — strange.

Background. The Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (DVA OIG) ordered an audit of the VR&E program in 2007 and a subsequent survey sampling of 80,000 veterans to find out why so many disabled veterans never complete the program. While VR&E boasts a success rate of close to 75 percent to the U.S. Congress, the real number is much lower. According to the DVA OIG, the true success rate is closer to 18 percent. Most qualified veterans drop out of Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) prior to developing an Individual Written Rehabilitation Plan (IWRP). Many more drop out prior to finishing the program. VR&E has not been including these cases in their reported success rate.

In Corporate America, this is called “cooking the books,” for which people have gone to jail and been sued. Lucky for VR&E, the officials of this ENRON of the federal government are largely blanketed by sovereign immunity. The government has to agree to let you sue the government. Convenient.

The following is a list of a few of most common fish stories given by Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors to deny veterans access to Chapter 31 benefits:

1. Veterans with high disability ratings usually fail to complete their training.
2. You cannot use Voc Rehab if you are Individually Unemployable (IU).
3. Veterans with families have a harder time completing their programs.
4. Voc Rehab will not pay for graduate school.
5. If you have a job, you do not qualify for Voc Rehab.

Lies – all lies. In a VA Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) Training Module Study Plan you can get plenty of valuable information about the program. Combined with the audit and survey linked above, the majority of truths to the lies can be found. So let’s raise the curtain a bit to reveal the great Oz.

Lie #1 – Veterans with high disability ratings usually fail to complete their training.
Truth – The survey states that veterans with a higher disability rating also have a higher likelihood of successfully completing their program. This includes veterans with VR&E ratings of “serious employment handicap.”

Lie #2 – You cannot use Voc Rehab if you are Individually Unemployable (IU).
Truth – According to the training module, veterans with a 100 percent disability rating can and do use VR&E for retraining purposes to obtain jobs, if possible. Additionally, veterans with an IU are also allowed to use the program. Further, finishing the training program does not automatically result in a reduction of IU. Supposedly, it cannot be reduced for a year following employment.

Lie #3 – Veterans with families have a harder time completing their programs.
Truth – There is no significant effect on program success rates when comparing veterans with families to those without families. This includes a comparison between veterans relating to spouses and veterans with children.

Lie #4 – Voc Rehab will not pay for graduate school.
Truth – I used VR&E for my undergrad and now have an Individualized Written Rehabilitation Plan stating I can attend law school in the program. ‘Nuff said. VR&E will send people to graduate school, to include law school, medical school, dental school, and airline pilot training. It can also pay for starting small businesses and allocating in excess of $100,000 for the start up, according to participating SBA Veteran Business Counselors working with the program.

Lie #5 – If you have a job, you do not qualify for Voc Rehab.
Truth – Over 42 percent of all disabled veterans using VR&E services are employed at the time of admittance. Thirty-five percent hold jobs throughout the period of retraining. Of those, over half of them felt their current job was inline with their military and/or civilian training. So, 28,000 veterans who used VR&E for retraining were employed at the time they entered the program.

That’s the truth about the VA, according to the VA. The information is out there, but it’s not presented in way that is readily accessible. Plus, it’s hard to pick your head up to do the research when your horns are locked with your Voc Rehab Counselor.

To the quality counselors out there, thank you for your diligent efforts to support disabled veterans in their quest for purpose and success outside of the green uniform. And to those who dish out fish stories, I for one have had it up to my eyeballs with you. There will be a day of reckoning, in this life or the next. Accountability will come for all the lives that have been hurt by the renegade behavior of some Voc Rehab Counselors. Many media outlets have begun to investigate the actions of the VA, including the actions of Voc Rehab officials. To you who do harm to vets, it’s time to be on the right side of this story.

Email questions to: help@disabledveterans.org

VA Begins to Process Agent Orange Presumptive Illnesses Claims

posted May 4, 2011 3:31 PM by Info @NesloVentures

December 23, 2010 - Vietnam Veterans suffering specific presumptive illnesses related to their Agent Orange exposure while in service began filing their disability claims approximately 6 weeks ago. In that time period, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) processed and resolved over 28,000 claims.

VA Sec. Eric Shinseki credited the VA's ability to process so many disability claims so quickly to improved technology. At the same time, he cited the continuous improving and streamlining of the disability claims process. According to Sec. Shinseki, the VA is also aggressively reaching out to Vietnam veterans and pushing them to put in their disability claims and take advantage of the earned benefits.  

This new Agent Orange presumptive disease list allows Vietnam veterans diagnosed with the following illnesses to collect disability benefits as well as be eligible for health care:

  • Parkinson's Disease;
  • Ischemic heart disease; or
  • B-cell (hairy cell) leukemia.

All Vietnam veterans suffering from an illness listed on the VA's presumptive list can file for disability compensation. Because of the number of claims the VA anticipated would be filed when they updated their presumptive illness, these claims are the first to utilize the VA's automated claims processing system.

Veterans can also be treated for their service-related presumptive illnesses through non-VA physicians. These claims can also be filed as long as they are accompanied with the correct paperwork.

Veteran's Benefits Administration not giving veterans proper benefits; refuses to correct mistake

posted May 4, 2011 6:29 AM by Info @NesloVentures

ST. PETERSBURG, Florida - From his one-room apartment,  Terry Richards does what he can to survive below the poverty level.

Richards, 62, is a Vietnam-era vet makes less than $12,000 a year in social security and pension benefits.  In years he spends a large portion of his income on medical expenses, he gets partial reimbursement.

"Every penny counts for me and others like me," Richards said of the 637,000 veterans and family members who rely on Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) pensions.

See Also: Vets lose benefits as VA covers up mistake

But Richards recently discovered that the miles he claimed for trips to his doctor's appointments weren't reimbursed at the 41.5-cent rate Congress mandated in 2008.  Because the VA hadn't updated its expense report form in years, veterans were still instructed to only claim 28.5 cents per mile.

For Richards, it made the difference of $56 one year.  10 News found other veterans with larger discrepancies.

"$56 is a lot of money when you only make $985 a month," Richards said.

He started writing letters to the VBA and Congressman Bill Young, a long-time veterans advocate.  The VBA eventually sent him a check for the $56, but still didn't update the forms.

A spokesperson for the agency told 10 News that updating the form online was unnecessary, since the VBA automatically credits veterans the difference once they send in their annual reports with the wrong amount.

But they didn't in the cases 10 News studied.  They also weren't able to tell how many of the forms were turned in last year.

Congressman Young eventually penned a letter to the head of the agency, citing "the need to immediate update the VA's 'Medical Expense Report' form (VA Form 21-8416) to ensure that our nation's veterans are properly being reimbursed for their travel expenses."

READ: Rep. Bill Young's letter (PDF)

Young also urged an audit of reports filed to find out how many veterans may have been shortchanged since Congress changed the reimbursement rate in 2008.

1-10 of 18